A two-page memo obtained by Axios outlined the conclusions, backed by video evidence, and insisted there were no legal grounds to pursue uncharged individuals
By Wayne Dupree
AI image depicting Elon Musk poking fun at AG Pam Bondi
- Elon Musk criticized the Department of Justice’s memo concluding Jeffrey Epstein’s death was a suicide and denying the existence of a client blackmail list, raising questions about transparency, accountability, and potential cover-ups. Musk’s remarks highlight ongoing skepticism about the investigation’s integrity and its implications for elite networks and political figures.
NEW YORK, NY (TDR) — Billionaire entrepreneur Elon Musk has taken aim at the Department of Justice’s (DOJ) findings regarding the death of convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, claiming the investigation raises more questions than answers. The DOJ memo, released Monday, concluded that Epstein died by suicide in 2019 and dismissed allegations of a blackmail “client list.”
DOJ Memo Declares Epstein’s Death a Suicide
The DOJ announced its final position on Epstein’s controversial case, stating there is “no credible evidence” supporting claims of foul play or a secret blackmail network involving prominent figures. A two-page memo obtained by Axios outlined the conclusions, backed by video evidence, and insisted there were no legal grounds to pursue uncharged individuals connected to Epstein’s operations.
The memo has drawn criticism from skeptics like Musk, who sarcastically tweeted, “It’s no-one-has-been-arrested-o’clock again,” questioning the lack of accountability for elites allegedly tied to Epstein. Analysts suggest Musk’s remarks reflect broader public distrust in the investigation process.
Musk Suggests Bipartisan Cover-Up
When a social media user argued that evidence of elite involvement would have surfaced publicly, Musk replied, hinting at a possible bipartisan effort to suppress information: “Unless both sides are involved in a cover-up.”
Musk’s skepticism aligns with recent polls showing that 62% of Americans doubt the official explanation of Epstein’s death. Critics, including lawmakers and watchdog groups, are calling for greater transparency from the DOJ to restore public confidence in the judicial system.
Political Ramifications of Musk’s Statements
Musk’s statements come amid his growing political engagement, including the launch of a third political party after distancing himself from President Trump. His critiques of Epstein-related findings may fuel debates about government transparency and elite accountability.
CLICK HERE TO READ MORE FROM THE THE DUPREE REPORT
Do you think President Trump’s tariff strategy is starting to pay off?
Should the DOJ face greater scrutiny over its handling of high-profile cases like Epstein’s? Let us know in the comments below.
This flies into the face of prior comments made by Pam Bondi, Kash Patel and many others, including President Trump. If this is allowed to go away then while I am a MAGA supported this will cause me to question many of the prior comments made concerning President Trump and his Cabinet. If this was in anyway true, then why did Pam Bondi comment about the horrific nature of some of the items she was ‘reviewing’. So this is just pure wrong and this needs to be taken up and away from folks who are apparently concerned about the truth coming out. And I said, I am a MAGA but if it comes out that President Trump had something to do with it, won’t change my mind about “Making America Great Again’ because it is not just one man, it is a movement and yes President Trump is the rallying point presently, figure heads can be replaced.
